Tag: public art

Artist Measures Visitor Attention Span With Kinect-Powered Tape Measurers

"Tape Recorders" (2011) by Rafael Lozano-Hemmer from bitforms gallery on Vimeo.

How much time do we spend looking at a work of art when we’re in a museum or gallery? Do we really take the time to reflect and let the work sink in? Or do we simply breeze by in an effort to see as much as possible? Some studies suggest that the average visitor only spends about 5 seconds looking at each work, but Mexican media artist Rafael Lozano-Hemmer has found a different way of measuring this interaction.

Lozano-Hemmer’s new installation Tape Recorders takes a more physical approach to calculating the answer to this question. Composed of a series of automated measuring tapes fixed to a wall, the tape ascends to the ceiling when visitors are present, tipped-off by a Kinect sensor. Once it reaches its peak, the tape crashes down, unable to hold itself up any longer, and is then reeled back in. Visitors can walk past the full spectrum of tape measurers, making them grow in succession as if performing the “wave,” or stand in front of one to force it to its crashing point. It also tabulates the collective time spent in front of the installation and prints out the summation every hour.

The installation’s awareness of its visitors seemingly has the effect of making them stay longer, incentivizing their attention with the tapes’ impending crash and recoil. Since the presence of people is required for the installation to activate, audience participation and appreciation is crucial to the piece—it would’t work otherwise. The longer visitors interact with the work, the more interesting it becomes.

Tape Recorders, along with several other works by Lozano-Hemmer, will be on view at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney through February 12th, 2012.

Artist Measures Visitor Attention Span With Kinect-Powered Tape Measurers
Dylan Schenker

Sticks and stones may break my Van Gogh

Vienna, Art and Design at the NGV, as the gallery's internal culture of bullying is scrutinised.
Vienna, Art and Design at the NGV, as the gallery’s internal culture of bullying is scrutinised. Photo: Penny Stephens

ALLEGATIONS of bullying at the National Gallery of Victoria have prompted scrutiny of its internal culture and have cast doubts on its commitment to tackling workplace bullying. There are at least two complaints of bullying against failed businessman Andrew O’Brien, who was appointed head of the gallery’s commercial operations in November 2005 and who abruptly resigned last week.

One of the employees who was allegedly bullied by Mr O’Brien, and who has since left the gallery, took the complaint to a lawyer after it was not resolved by the gallery, despite union involvement. Industrial relations lawyer David Shaw, of Holding Redlich, said he had represented an NGV employee in a bullying complaint against Mr O’Brien. The case was settled several months ago and the person, who no longer works for the NGV, signed a confidentiality agreement. The Age was unable to contact Mr O’Brien.

Continue reading »

The Periscope Project

The Periscope Project is a hip new shipping container art space that sits on a tiny lot in downtown San Diego. Built with 5 recycled shipping containers, the collective includes space for live/work units, a store front, exhibition space and a common courtyard that provides performance space. Originally started back in 2007 by the late Petar Perisi and designed by ENS_Projects, The Periscope Project regularly holds openings, discussions and workshops to progress experiments in alternative development, public education, and cultural practices.

Construction on the exhibition and studio space began back in 2007 and has slowly progressed over the years with the addition of the containers. The exhibition space is composed of 5 shipping containers, with four stacked in a row two stories high and the fifth forming the storefront at the street. Stairs and bridges connect the ground floor to the second floor and a large landscaped courtyard space provides a common area for meetings, gatherings and performances. The courtyard makes use of recycled tires as planters and succulents fill the space with green.

The space is now wholly functioning and has, for over a year, maintained a “gallery, hosted exhibitions, and provided free workspace and amenities for students, artists, architects, designers, scholars, and activists committed to improving the community.”  Currently the organization is hosting summer labs for grade-school through college level students to educate on a wide range of topics including photography, video-making, construction, hydroponic gardening, and critical thinking skills as potent tools for urban analysis, public art, and environmental sustainability. The longterm goal is of course economic sustainability for the organization, but currently they are seeking financial assistance for their summer workshops through Kickstarter. Additional funds will go towards supporting underprivileged students, classroom furniture, and media equipment.

Art and the Public Domain: Olafur Eliasson, Tomas Saraceno, and Ai Weiwei at the GSD

The Divine Comedy, a current exhibition at the Harvard Graduate School of Design, features world renowned artists known for blurring the boundaries between art, architecture, and political activism. The press release explains the show’s intention to engage the “public domain.” But does a private university really qualify as public?

2011-04-11-divinecomedy1_cropped.jpg

This isn’t art accessible to a mass audience at the scale of Anish Kapoor’s Cloud Gate in Chicago or Christo’s Gates project in Central Park, but is nonetheless uniquely situated to be vicariously observed – scattered across lobby or courtyard site specific locations on campus. Inspired by the epic Dante poem, these works were curated around the themes of history (Ai Weiwei), mind (Olafur Eliasson), and cosmos (Tomas Saraceno). Ai Weiwei memorializes Chinese school children who died in a major 2008 earthquake, using 5335 identical backpacks (representing each student) arranged into cubes and accompanied by an audio recording reciting their names. This political statement protests poorly constructed schools, and demands government accountability (the kind of questioning that has led to his trouble with the Chinese authorities, and mysterious “disappearance”).

Saraceno took to the sky with Cloud City. More than just a visual statement — this strange floating sculpture docked at the Le Corbusier designed School for Visual Arts is outfitted with solar panels and sensors making it a weather vehicle capable of flight and transmitting atmospheric data back to the site. Half art project, half science experiment — Saraceno’s installation is more closely related to the Eliasson exhibit — which delves further into scientific inquiry. Eliasson’s 55 art object devices scattered through Gund Hall’s lobby completely alter the character of the architecture school to feel more like a laboratory.

2011-04-11-2_overallsho_700.jpg

A spinning gyrosphere, chromatic wheels, meteorite chandeliers, and cleverly arranged mirrors offer curious distractions to students on their way to studios.

2011-04-11-divinecomedy2_composite.jpg

Eliasson’s fun house experiments are aimed at challenging traditional notions of perception. By revealing peculiar properties of light and space (the same mediums designers tinker with) he sets a tone of playful experimentation, pulling viewers in to more closely inspect, and question. One of the most interesting potentials in pairing exhibit with academic studio — are that the creative insights it provokes might even filter in and enhance the design process.

2011-04-11-6_spriograph_700.jpg

In the photo above, two complete strangers collaborate to create spirograph designs (the drawing arm is set in motion by users and propelled by the momentum of counterweights).

Whether or not art is technically “public” — situated in everyday contexts, viewed over and over in passing — has a unique ability to powerfully shape the identity of a place, reveal aspects otherwise overlooked, even promote social engagement. After seeing this show at the forefront of a growing trend to extend art beyond the confines of the gallery — I’m curious what other spaces might host this type of site specific installation?

 

David Glick, Huffington post, 04/19/11 01:21

Sally Tape & Candice Cranmer, I steal from work and I steal from You Tube, 2011

Sally Tape & Candice Cranmer, I steal from work and I steal from You Tube, 2011

I steal from work and I steal from You Tube

Sally Tape & Candice Cranmer

MAILBOX 141

Entrance, 141-3 Flinders Lane, Melbourne (between Russell Street and Olivers Lane)

Viewing hours –  Monday – Friday 8am – 6pm & Saturdays 10am – 5pm.

5 APRIL – 6 MAY 2011
OPENING Tuesday 5 April 5.30pm

In the unique Mailbox space, they present a collection of collage and photographs. The artists perceive the space as an apparatus by which to explore and invite voyeuristic pleasure. Tape’s images take the appearance of venetian blinds, allowing partial glimpses. They are composed abstractly using the remnant strips found in the photo-printing machinery of a workplace.

Cranmer’s are directly taken from ‘the funniest falls ever (I think)’, a You Tube collection. Whilst Tape collects, archives and reflects on memory relative to the ‘now’ point in time, Cranmer investigates fulfilled expectation and anticipation. This extends her research into the futile and voyeuristic pleasure of watching people’s slapstick failings on You Tube.

http://www.sallytape.com.au/
candicecranmer@blogspot.com

MAILBOX 141 is an alternative public art space that supports artistic experimentation and exhibition of new work. Located at 141 Flinders Lane – near the corner of Russell Street in the heart of Melbourne’s arts precinct – artists are invited to create site specific work for a strip of restored mailboxes in the entrance foyer.

Art work may be viewed from 8am – 6pm Monday to Friday, and 10am – 5pm Saturdays.

Reminders of our urban heritage in the midst of the corporate streetscape, MAILBOX 141 enlivens the imaginative space of the city. As part of the diverse network linking art schools, studio artists, artist-run initiatives and business, MAILBOX 141 offers another possibility for individual artists to inhabit public space in the city of Melbourne and contributes to an authentic and often unexpected cultural experience for viewers.

MAILBOX is supported by and operates in collaboration with 141-143 Flinders Lane.

Haroon Mirza: Play that funky cardboard

    ross Section  of a Revolution, 2011, by Haroon Mirza
    Fun and liberating . . . Cross Section of a Revolution, 2011 Photograph: Ken Adlard

    When Haroon Mirza won the Northern Art prize earlier this year, the regional news programme Look North followed its report on his victory with some studio banter. “The weatherman threw some clothes on the floor,” remembers Mirza, “and said he could win a modern art prize. It escalated into a controversy – but I just thought it was a bit funny.”

    The joke is now on Look North as the award has led to an exhibition of Mirza’s work at the prestigious Lisson Gallery in London. But the truth is there’s something nostalgic, rather than offensive, about Look North’s response. In the 1990s, when British contemporary art leapt into the limelight, tabloids were constantly making jokes in the same vein. The Sun took a bag of chips to the Saatchi Gallery: “We bring the chips to Damien Hirst’s fish.” That kind of mockery has long lost its edge in London: the art world rules down south. But in the north, apparently, artists still have to endure taunts. And this is not bad for art at all, if Mirza is anything to go by.

    Mirza is something new: an exciting young artist – he’s 33 – who chooses to work in northern England, despite being born in London. Before 1,000 people write in to point out that the north has many fine artists, can I just say this: pull the other one. The north has for years been the dog that did not bark in British art. Liverpool, Manchester and other cities have staged high-profile art events and commissioned public art, not least Gateshead’s Angel of the North; a visiting Martian might even have concluded that the region was the epicentre of British art. But it’s not. No matter how much effort has gone into fabricating an art scene, there is a world of difference between being a place that promotes art, and being a place where artists choose to live and work. Northern English cities never became real centres of artistic creativity in the way Glasgow and London are. But if Mirza is anything to go by, that is changing.

    Continue reading »

Daniel Buren

He started his training at the École des Métiers d´Art, followed by a brief sojourn at the École National Supérieure de Beaux Arts. He has explored all disciplines, from painting to cinema. Among his chief concerns is the ‘scene of production’ as a way of presenting art and highlighting facture (the process of ‘making’ rather than for example, mimesis or representation of anything but the work itself). The work is site specific installation, having a relation to its setting in contrast to prevailing ideas of a work of art standing alone.

In the late 1960s Buren hit on the mark that connected him with ideas of space and presentation arising through deconstructionist philosophies backgrounding the May 1968 student demonstrations in France.

Working in situ (on site), he strives to contextualise his artistic practice using the stripe – a popular French fabric motif – a means of visually relating art to its situation, a form of language in space rather than a space in itself. He began producing unsolicited public art works using striped awning canvas common in France. The stripe is a standard 8.7 cm wide. Denoting the trademark stripes as a visual instrument or ‘seeing tool’ he invites us to take up his critical standpoint challenging traditional ideas about art.

He started by setting up hundreds of striped posters around Paris and later in more than 100 metro stations, drawing public attention through these unauthorised bandit style acts. In another controversial gesture he blocked the entrance of the gallery with stripes at his first solo exhibition.

As a conceptual artist, he was regarded as visually and spatially audacious, objecting to traditional ways of presenting art through the museum/gallery system while at the same time growing in hot demand to show via the system.Since 1970 he has applied this obsessive language to the production of installations. He has no qualms about working in public spaces whether or not he has authorization. This has brought him problems with the police on more than one occasion. Buren is certainly one of the most solid representatives of Street Art.

In 1975 he entered a new stage in which he would create his works in the same place where they were to be exhibited. This means installations closely tied to the architecture and the scenic setting, and he calls them “cabane eclatée.” Some of these works have been the basis of virulent disputes among the general public and in the media, as happened regarding the one he created in 1986 called ‘Deux Plateaux,” a 3000 square-meter installation with which he virtually took over one of the courtyards of the Palais-Royal in Paris. The venerable seventeenth century building whose construction was commissioned by Cardinal Richelieu found itself invaded by numerous columns of varying sizes that Daniel Buren covered with his typical black and white stripes. This work, which was on the verge of toppling the whole Ministry of Culture, now holds a certification as a National Monument.

Most importantly for me however he wrote the articles about‘ the function of the studio’and ‘the function of the museum’. However outdated you might find them, they outline the histories that artists have grown from.

Public spaces: Art that’s flung open to all of Los Angeles

JvuhcbncHOLZER

A giant bulb atop the Standard Hotel in West Hollywood. A letter denying a Mexican citizen a visa plastered across the facade of the Geffen Contemporary. The words “leave the land alone” scrawled by plane across the sky.

There’s been a striking upswing in public art in Los Angeles in recent years, but it may not look like what you’ve come to expect from the murals that have long predominated. Indeed, if you happened upon any of these recent projects, you may have had little idea that you were looking at artwork at all.

The shift reflects the emergence of a relatively new institutional player: the independent public art nonprofit. Unencumbered by the obligations of a city agency, the commercial demands of a gallery or the institutional identity of a museum, these organizations have managed to mount projects — mostly temporary — of an exceedingly varied nature, including billboards, sculpture and guerrilla performances.

West of Rome, Los Angeles Nomadic Division (LAND), LAXART, Outpost for Contemporary Art and the Watts House Project — all of which emerged or received their nonprofit status within the last five years — are dedicated in large part to the production of art in public spaces.

These are small, administratively nimble institutions, funded, for the most part, through grants and individual contributions. (Both West of Rome and LAND have their first major benefits scheduled for July.)

The difficulties plaguing public art in Los Angeles are myriad in even the best of circumstances. A geographically vast region encompassing multiple municipalities and enormous cultural diversity, with little to no pedestrian presence and a visual sphere dominated by commercial messaging, the city is a complicated slate, one that upends traditional notions of what “public” even means.

Bureaucratic conditions are no more favorable. Muralists have been hamstrung for years by a pending moratorium on new billboards, waiting for city attorneys to get around to crafting a legal distinction between art and advertising. L.A. ranks well below other major U.S. cities in arts spending.

The recession has done as much to help as to challenge the nonprofits’ emergence. It freed up real estate and billboard space, making it much easier for the nonprofit MAK Center, for instance, to mount a 21-billboard “exhibition” across the city earlier this year. It has also tempered the hegemony of the gallery system, loosening its hold on both the time and, with luck, the imagination of its artists.

“I really feel that the professional structures of the art world are collapsing on themselves,” says West of Rome founder Emi Fontana. “They were very fragile, coming together with the last economic bubble, and now the money is gone — boom, collapsed.”

Fontana ran a commercial gallery for 20 years in Milan, Italy, before coming to Los Angeles but grew frustrated with what she describes as “the tyranny of the space, the constriction.”

She launched West of Rome in 2005 with a site-specific installation, and she’s become best known since for large-scale projects by big-name artists: a video installation by T. Kelly Mason and Diana Thater in a former bridal shop in Westwood; billboards by Cindy Sherman and Barbara Kruger; and a viral poster and sticker campaign by Jenny Holzer.

Outpost founder Julie Deamer came from a gallery background as well, in San Francisco. She launched Outpost in 2004 as an itinerant endeavor, intending to open an exhibition space when she’d raised a sufficient operating budget. Over time, however, she came to feel that she was better off without one.

“I realized that I had grown tired of the exhibition format,” she says. “There’s something sort of static about it, getting people to come in and always working within the same sort of space.”

Outpost does operate a space now, Outpost HQ in Highland Park, but it’s a meeting place rather than a gallery, with room for events and a library that’s open to the public.

LAXART, the most established and prolific of the nonprofits, has paired public and exhibition programming since its emergence five years ago — it mounts 12 shows a year in its La Cienega gallery — but has greatly expanded its public activities in response to the number of proposals from artists.

In all of these discussions, the city itself emerges as a pivotal factor: a sprawling, difficult, ever-changing entity that allows for — indeed, demands — a nontraditional approach.

LAND founder Shamim Momin spent 12 years at the Whitney Museum in New York before moving to L.A. When she and LAND co-founder Christine Y. Kim (now at LACMA) began to envision an organization flexible enough to reflect these shifts, “the only place that really made sense was L.A. Partly because of the artists, but also because of the structure of the city, the openness of the possibilities here.”

What’s at stake in all of these endeavors is not only an increase in public projects but also a reevaluation of what public art can be. Nothing embodies this state
of flux more than the Watts House Project. Billing itself as “a collaborative artwork in the shape of a neighborhood development,” it pairs artists and architects with residents along a single city block in Watts, adjacent to the Towers. They’ve planted vegetables, repaired roofs, laid driveways, painted a mural across one of the houses, hosted readings and put numerous residents to work. In the future they hope to open a cafe.

“We’re constantly trying to push that the houses are not the end result,” says Edgar Arceneaux, the project’s director and a respected artist in his own right.

In moving beyond the public art model mired in bureaucracy, Watts House Project and the others are poised to help L.A. live up to its cultural potential by creating a channel between the city’s artists and its public realm.

–Holly Meyers

9:19 AM PT, July 6, 2010

Research

I am holistically researching Aesthetics and Display in Art practice and Curation. This has currently involved me in researching Collaborative practice, Museology. Compared to painting for example I find that the writing about collaborative art, as in the marking/ understanding of collaborative art is hard. This I believe is because the participants determine the outcomes. The work essentially has a need for all participants to be able to evaluate all components equally. The problem is that there are no rules only examples throughout history (as written about by Bourriard, Kester and Bishop) this is conceptually flawed in terms of art as essentially the point of art is that of the discovery of ideas and the creatively new! I think that I can break my break my art practice into three differing parts:

Conception
Planning
Event

Which seems to create three concepts to explore, and create three modes of research

Aesthetics of making
The culture of display
Social science Public art and its architecture

Tentatively I am trying to write about cultures of display, essentially these aesthetic trends

Related Posts with Thumbnails