Tag: artwork

Show them the money

Denis Beaubois' artwork 'Currency'.Denis Beaubois’ artwork ‘Currency’.

How much would you pay for 200 $100 notes? It sounds like a trick question but Sydney conceptual artist Denis Beaubois’s work Currency, which goes under the hammer at art auction house Deutscher and Hackett this month, is just that – 200 uncirculated $100 notes.

The auction estimate is $15,000 to $20,000. The lower amount would mean some lucky collector could profit on the work before even taking it home. But it’s equally possible that the deliberately provocative ”sculpture” could fetch a higher price than its economic worth.

Beaubois, a performance and video artist for more than 20 years, says he is interested in exploring currency ”as an architecture of possibility”.

Artist Denis Beaubois in his Marrickville home.Artist Denis Beaubois in his Marrickville home. Photo: Jon Reid

”When you look at this [work] it plays on different aspects of desire – it can be an insult to you, it can be thought … for someone it may mean half a year’s rent, for another person it might mean medical treatment, for another, a kick-arse holiday,” he said yesterday. ”We’ll see if placing it within in art context will elevate the value or degrade it.”

The fact that the cash came from an Australia Council for the Arts grant adds further controversy.

”Some might see it as a comment on the funding system, while someone else might see it only as a quick way of making some money,” Beaubois said. ”Within the realm of an artwork, people might get something that contains all of these ideas; all of the good and all off the bad are in there.”

Kylie Northover The Age, August 18, 2011

Breaking down some (white) walls

Opened this past weekend is yet another art gallery for inner-Melbourne-urbanites to add to the growing list of which to frequent in tight black jeans and an oh-too-cool look. But, alas, there is something wrong. There is something a little bit different. This does not seem to be the norm. This gallery, Fehily Contemporary on Glasshouse Road in Collingwood, is a little bit different. There appears, here, to be some sort of ‘feeling’.

Now, all easy puns aside; a quick moment to describe. The ‘feeling’, is not in any way related to any derivative of any kind of ‘vibe’ that might be already associated with any number of the burgeoning ARIs or contemporary private galleries around the place. The ‘feeling’, has nothing to do with rustic milk-crates-as-chairs style decor or associated trendy art-scene style. The ‘feeling’ has little to do with these notions and everything to do with the manner in which art, artists and how an approach to the art world is considered.

The Fehily artists are not referred to as ‘stock’ or a ‘stable’ and they, all, are considered equals as well as associates of the gallery; encouraged to contribute to the development of an artists’ agreement, not expected to simply fling their signature at an art ‘worker’s’ contract. The work that these artists produce is not forced so harshly into little pigeon-boxes that small pieces of it break off, leaving said artist trembling and sobbing in a bleak, stained, studio corner, broken and integrally disemboweled. It is, instead, welcomed with such relish, in all manners and with an holistic appreciation for its implicit evolution that the artists are almost openly encouraged to explore their practice and not merely ‘churn’ for the next decade. These artists are not owned. Represented within the Fehily family are an enlightening mix, which also adds to the feeling that perhaps there is another way for the art world to function. Young and mature artists, in both age and practice, are brought together as well as national and international representatives. Old faves Richard Lewer, Sally Smart and Ricky Maynard hang alongside contemporary buzz-names Ash Keating, Nick Devlin and Patrick Pound as well as long-time-working-short-time-trending artists like Scott Miles, Graham Brindley and Angela Ellsworth.

And the ‘feeling’? It seems good, the feeling is good. The Fehily’s ethos comes through in the space, the works, the set-up and their methods. That they consider a cyclical approach to the working of the art industry is evidence of their own passion and understanding for supporting artists’ careers. There appear to be no secrets and the Fehily’s seem keen to lay their cards on the table and encourage others to play with them.

Perhaps this is what the Melbourne (if not broader) art world needs the most. That perhaps when the gallerists, collectors and even curators level out and stop perpetuating an ‘us’ and ‘them’ scenario then that buzz, that energy, that feeling that seemed to be fading, will come back to our contemporary scene and the artists and all stakeholders within might actually be able to just get on with it, for all the reasons that set us down that path in the first place.

Fehily Contemporary ArtistsTHURS 12 MAY – SAT 4 JUNE – Glasshouse Road, Collingwood.

Tracey Emin: Excess all areas

Tracey Emin show Love Is What You Want

Powerful … Sleeping With You, by Tracey Emin. Photograph: David Levene

Tracy Emin’s confessional, confrontational art is hard to take in large doses. For some, even a small, homeopathic dose is too much – but the cumulative effect is extremely powerful. It is also confusing. Her work churns you up, and leaves you with more than ambivalence. At its best, it touches a sense of abjection; at its worst, it is abject for all the wrong reasons. Sometimes it’s hard to work out which is which.

Love Is What You Want, at the Hayward Gallery in London, is Emin’s biggest show to date. It’s all here: Emin masturbating in a jerky hand-drawn 2009 animation; the artist spreading her legs; the artist with her head in a fire and lonely under the shower. Emin dancing, Emin on all fours, Emin’s abortions, her burnt offerings, her neon curses and jibes, her embroidered desires. There’s even her death mask, although she’s very much alive. It’s a risky show, but Emin is all about risk: the risk of self-indulgence as well as self-exposure.

Continue reading »

Substance ‘TALK’ At Guilford Lane Thursday 15th from 6pm

Talk on thursday evening , 6pm, in the gallery space.


Substance is a group that explores materiality in 21st century art. Material works produced since the 1970s carry deeper intentions that are inevitably read into the time it was produced, or

the context in which it the object is placed. One can no longer view a minimalist sculpture, and consider it purely for its formal qualities. The postmodern agenda almost demands that substantial meaning be applied to material objects. It is difficult to consider a formal artwork in post-modern art, and not engender conceptual or narrative concerns. The exhibiting artists are concerned with materiality and abstraction and apply a deeper substance to their work, either through their process or by implying a reading onto the work.

Each artwork carries within it its own formal aesthetic. In modernist thought it could be viewed as a purely formal work. However on further consideration, one could argue that the materiality of these works in Substance is linked through context. By placing them together we question the nature of their formality, and the bearing that each work has on the others in the space. Substance proposes that when we observe these substances together, the postmodern condition, born of an age of digital and artificial ambiguity, is programmed to read these artworks as more than merely formal. Substance is beyond mere materiality, it is an exploration of today’s insistence for concept and narrative. This show aims to provoke questions in the viewer – are these works purely material, or is there substance to them?

collage

Utopian Slumps, The Margaret Lawrence Gallery and Sutton

Bonjour, or more like ‘Sacrebleu’, went for a wander the other day and copped an eye full of Art.

BNP Paribas Home Page Aug 2009

I managed to catch the end of Sarah Hughes’ worldwide Optimism show in Sutton. The Auckland-based  artist’s work comes from her interest in economics, contemporary social parameters, our the digital age, with the endless flow of information, processed through her investigation of colour. The most exciting aspect of the show was the image. It seemed to concretely express all of her ideas simply through abstracted colour prints. Sifting through the Home page of BNP Paribas she dissects the colour palate, describing the make up of the website through a different set of semiotics, forcing you to consider the makeup of these corporations.

The Margret Lawrence show was Lamp/ Table/ Chair/ Big Painting. Another show that tries to reinvigorate Kippenbergers’ The happy ending of Franz Kafaka’s novel Amerika. Again There seemed to be something missing from the plot. The artworks individually were considered, with great enthusiasm and attention material. What ever happened to autonomy? Why can’t an exploration of material be convincing enough? have a look here for a quick pan around the space that I took Margaret Lawrence Gallery. tell me what you think.

And last but by no means least Utopian Slumps, and I must humble myself and eat my own words, because the Mischa Hollenbach (14 May – 5th June) was brilliant, and not just because of the neon lights! with different aspects of his practice on display they all had a certain irreverence but all had such delicate detailing and overt deliberation. His mixing of small intimate sculptures with large prints that were cut and collaged together, and even these diverse works has a certain unity in their making that I enjoyed and which created a certain feeling in the space.

Holey

cut out holey

Holey

This is a small incidental art work, it is simply a play on words. The English language is full of peculiarities that both annoy and fascinate me. Here playing with the potential meanings of words, I want to embrace all possibilities, and therefore create an more interesting artwork. Holey, could be read as:

Holy, which would reference divinity and religion, which has corralled the Artistic canon for centuries.
Wholly as in the whole of something, complete or finished
Or Hole-y as in full of holes, to be incomplete.
I just liked the play of holes creating the shapes that spell out its own form.

Greater than One, Monash Faculty Gallery

taking a breath for a walk

taking a breath for a walk

The premise of this show was based in the concept of one, how many ideas could you retrieve out of one thing, one space, one element of time, or in one particular case one breath taking a breath for a walk. This Artwork is simply titled, Andrew uses twelve balloons to exhale and inhale the singular breath which travels through the balloons. We see him here in the video finishing the walk. The simplicity of the performance was I think it’s greatest strength. The silence that it provoked left room to consider the breathing that we perform daily without recognition.

The rest of the show was pretty underwhelming apart from the raucous and raunchy performance by CCC inc. in the front window and the playful plaster catapult by Nikos Pantazopoulos and Pippa McGill.

Andrew Goodman, taking a breath for a walk from oliver cloke on Vimeo.

Studio Gallery

kathy in the studio gallery

The Studio Gallery Was a space that I created, which allowed artists to have a place to exhibit their artworks without the brain damage that comes with critique, self doubt or a big party. This Space was quiet and solitary, it allowed the artist a way of making or displaying artwork that may have not fitted their usual oeuvre, or even pushed them to do something artistically uncomfortable. I asked only that the participant leave something of their work so that I became a repository and the next artwork would then have to find some cohesion with the previous occupants.

How to approach an Artwork

This guide is for reference only. Try these procedures in art galleries in order to assimilate. Like a dance you should parade around the gallery, flirting with the art. Start by:

Choosing an impressively large piece of art preferably a painting.

Approach the artwork with confident strides.

Look convinced about how you must appreciate the artwork’s subtleties, especially if there aren’t any.

Put both hand on your hips and lean slightly back, observe the ‘workmanship’.

Remove your right hand and gently stroke your chin, as if to question your presupposed arrogance of your first appreciation.

Then walk forward and peer into the depths of it

Make a deep nasal noise that denotes an interest.

Then stroke your chin again.

Make a comment about preferring his (the painters) earlier works being less constructed and quote something from a book.

Related Posts with Thumbnails