Utopian Slumps Opening!!

http://my247.com.au/247venue_images/-20081211-utopian%20slumps.jpgOn Thursday night I went to the opening of Utopian Slumps’ new space on Guilford Lane. Faced by a vast crowd I had to fight to get through the flock of seagulls… sorry I mean haircuts. Guilford Lane being the new place ‘to be seen’ made it hard to be able to even get into see the art. As per usual the space is a manicured white cube. Defined only by the quirky and cultish that was on display (without even considering the crowd). To be honest I was waiting to be impressed, and very little did. All the work seemed sloppy, as is De-rigueur, but unknowing (or too knowing) of its outsider roots it became slapstick. The irony of settling a laptop on the ground, which has been painted on, is lost on this tourist. I gurgled my Grolsch and buggered off. Not on my recommended list.

From www.worldwidereview.com

From:     Robert Shell

Category: Art

Date:     07 September 2006

Time:     08:29 AM

Review:  I kill myself because of the British Art Establishment.  60 years of British Art disinterred from the Arts Council Collection and grimly entitled “How to Improve  the World”, like the ghastly double-speak of state power: Guantanamo protects freedom. Arbeit  Macht Frei.  The longest queue was for where they were serving sponsored pies. Starving graying YBAs crushing  and trampling and gouging each other in a frantic effort to get their cannibal hands on some pastry  containing the ground-up remains of failed artists and the gravy of their pathetic dreams.   A man, a moustache, an adminstrator, and art bureaucrat, Sir Christoper Frayling, MBE, order of the  garter etc, made some tedious remarks boomed out on speakers, while the crowd of notables and  art school lecturers stood in obsequious quietude. The new director, Mr Ralph Rugoff, modest in  crumpled American academic garb, said some other boring nothing words, and the daring world-  changing brilliant talents of shocking Art Britain, the world’s greatest art superpower, stood around  respectfully daringly waiting to get there hands on more free drinks and pies.   This is it baby, the centre of it all. These people in all their thrilling diversity represent most of what is  happening. Look a man in a dress! Look sour-faced old Nick Serota! Look a queue of people to get  IN and a women with clipboards keeping uninvited scum rif-raff OUT.  Look at this art: an Ian Davenport and Lucien Freud, a Hockney done at college, a Sarah Lucas and  a tatty Damien Hirst, a Doig and Ophili, the painty double act, some people you haven’t heard of, that  guy Titchner who’s up for the TP, Bob&Roberta Smith has made a funny sign out of bits of old wood,  ha ha! A bucket by Craig-Martin.  This is the best. This is art. This will be remembered. If you’re not  here, you haven’t made it. You’re just a feeble art student. This great art is not that great, however,  unfortunately, sorry to tell you.  Some of the artists have even brought their gallerists (did you know that gallerist is not even an official  word), a fine bunch of coiffeured specimens, make sure you don’t tread on their toes, and don’t even  speak to them, they don’t like to be bothered by artists. Some gallerists have even brought their  artists, and don’t bother them either, they are busy talking to someone who might give them a grant or  be on a committee that will buy their work, busy with sacred business.  I kill myself because of the British Art Establishment.   Because the only thing that matters is success (something I am economizing on) which is defined by  success which is defined by success, which is what matters.  Because a small group of mediocrities is pumped up by reviews, scholarships, prizes, attention,  money, collectors, and galleries, while I watch flaccid. The whole system, art school, funding bodies,  institutions, galleries etc is staffed by the dumbos, the asslickers, the turgid bores, the hard core self- promoters, the cynical, the insanely determined. They fly ever higher, while I stunted, die.

Because these people define success, and I won’t ask them for a favour. Because it’s not a conspiracy, just a bunch of people doing what’s best for themselves. Because when I was a child, I thought art was being a  genius, like Picasso or Matisse, not ass-licking in the pub or going to the right party. Because those in charge are boring and I can’t be friends with them.  It’s true that history is for winners, and I am a loser. Daring dreams, bold art, rebellion/revolution are  slogans for knowing artists to turn into ironic posters, please stop taking them seriously.  I kill myself because the British Art Establishment have established an aggressive culture of success  based on a few bureaucrats, a few collectors, a few galleries, and a few artists that matter. Too few  for me.

The Dewey Decimal Classification System

IMG_3923

The Dewey Decimal Classification System attempts to organize all knowledge into ten main classes. The ten main classes are each further subdivided into ten divisions, and each division into ten sections, giving ten main classes, 100 divisions and 1000 sections. DDC’s advantage in using decimals for its categories allows it to be both purely numerical and infinitely hierarchical. It also uses some aspects of a faceted classification scheme, combining elements from different parts of the structure to construct a number representing the subject content (often combining two subject elements with linking numbers and geographical and temporal elements) and form of an item rather than drawing upon a list containing each class and its meaning. Books are placed on the shelf in increasing numerical order of the decimal number, e.g. 050, 220, 330, 330.973, 331. When two books have the same classification number the second line of the call number (usually the first letter or letters of the author’s last name, the title if there is no identifiable author) is placed in alphabetical order.